What is the Id-by-Whiskey Fallacy?

Also known as “Ad Hominem Abusio” or “The Drunkard’s Refutation,” this fallacy occurs when someone attempts to discredit or dismiss an argument based on the person’s state of intoxication or impairment, rather than addressing the substance of their claims.

How does the Id-by-Whiskey Fallacy work?

Here are some examples to illustrate this fallacy:

1. Dismissing arguments due to intoxication: Assuming that someone’s argument is invalid simply because they have been drinking.
   * Example: “You’re just saying that because you’ve had too much whiskey, so your opinion doesn’t count.”
2. Impugning credibility based on substance use: Questioning someone’s credibility or expertise solely because of their substance use habits.
   * Example: “I don’t trust your judgment on this matter because I know you’ve been smoking pot all day.”
3. Reducing arguments to personal attacks: Focusing on the person’s state of intoxication rather than addressing the argument itself.
   * Example: “You’re just a drunk fool who doesn’t know what they’re talking about, so your opinion is worthless.”

Why is this fallacy so problematic?

The Id-by-Whiskey Fallacy can lead to:

1. Avoiding constructive discussion: Dismissing arguments based on personal characteristics rather than addressing the substance of the claims.
2. Personal attacks and ad hominem reasoning: Focusing on personal traits or behaviors rather than engaging with the argument itself.
3. Invalidating legitimate perspectives: Discounting someone’s views simply because they are intoxicated, rather than considering their potential value.

How to counter the Id-by-Whiskey Fallacy?

To protect yourself against this fallacy:

1. Address the argument, not the person: Focus on the substance of the claims and avoid personal attacks.
2. Separate intoxication from argument validity: Recognize that someone’s state of intoxication does not necessarily affect the validity of their arguments.
3. Evaluate claims based on evidence: Consider the evidence and reasoning presented, rather than dismissing it due to the person’s substance use.

By recognizing the Id-by-Whiskey Fallacy, you’ll become more adept at engaging in constructive discussions and evaluating arguments based on their merits, rather than being swayed by personal characteristics or circumstances.

---

Filed under: Uncategorized - @ September 27, 2024 5:34 am