The Is-Ought Fallacy The Is-Ought Fallacy is a type of informal fallacy that occurs when someone assumes that because something is the case (is), it ought to be the case, or vice versa. This fallacy involves confusing descriptive statements (what is) with prescriptive statements (what ought to be), leading to flawed reasoning and decision-making. Definition […]

The Naturalistic Fallacy The Naturalistic Fallacy is a type of informal fallacy that occurs when someone assumes that because something is natural, it must also be good, right, or desirable. This fallacy involves confusing descriptive statements (what is) with prescriptive statements (what ought to be), leading to flawed reasoning and decision-making. Definition and Explanation The […]

The Moralistic Fallacy The Moralistic Fallacy is a type of informal fallacy that occurs when someone assumes that because an action or behavior is morally right, it must also be practically effective or desirable in all circumstances. This fallacy involves confusing moral judgments with factual assessments, leading to unrealistic expectations and flawed decision-making. Definition and […]

The “I’m Entitled to My Opinion” Fallacy The “I’m Entitled to My Opinion” fallacy is a type of informal fallacy that occurs when someone uses their right to have an opinion as a justification for dismissing criticism or opposing viewpoints. This fallacy involves confusing the right to hold an opinion with the idea that opinions […]

Genetic Fallacy The Genetic Fallacy is a type of logical fallacy that occurs when someone tries to discredit or disprove an argument by attacking its origin, history, or source rather than addressing the content and validity of the argument itself. This fallacy involves attempting to undermine an idea or theory by highlighting perceived flaws in […]

Fallacy of Relative Privation The Fallacy of Relative Privation is a type of cognitive bias that occurs when someone argues that a problem or issue is not significant because others have it worse. This fallacy involves downplaying or dismissing the severity of an issue by comparing it to more severe problems experienced by others. Definition […]

Chronological Snobbery Fallacy The Chronological Snobbery fallacy is a type of cognitive bias that occurs when someone assumes that something new must be better or more valuable simply because it is newer, while disregarding the value and relevance of older things. This fallacy involves a biased judgment based on temporal proximity rather than actual merit. […]

The Bulverism Fallacy: When Motives Trump Reason The Bulverism Fallacy is a type of logical fallacy that occurs when someone attributes an opposing argument or viewpoint to a perceived motive, bias, or personal characteristic, rather than addressing the substance of the issue. This fallacy involves dismissing or discrediting an opponent’s argument based on assumptions about […]

The Ipse Dixit Fallacy: When Authority Trumps Evidence The Ipse Dixit Fallacy is a type of logical fallacy that occurs when someone relies on their own authority, reputation, or credentials to support an argument or claim, rather than providing evidence or logical reasoning. This fallacy involves using one’s own opinion or assertion as the sole […]

The Logic Chopping Fallacy: When Reasoning Goes Awry The Logic Chopping Fallacy is a type of logical fallacy that occurs when someone breaks down an argument or issue into smaller, isolated components and then criticizes each component individually, often ignoring the broader context and relationships between them. This fallacy involves focusing on minor flaws or […]